10:29 YouTube Video
Know the TRUTH about the Government Health Care Bill H.R.3200 - Key Points
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcBaSP31Be8
Update: Yes the healthcare bill HR3962 passed. Now it's up to us to do all we can to repeal it!! This video is based on HR3200 but it is very closely related to HR3962 with the exception that HR3962 is deemed to be worse yet. If we don't get this bill thrown in the trash where it belongs we can expect to see much if not all of what this video shows us. THE PDF.OF THE BILL HR3200 NOTED AT THE END OF THE VIDEO IS NO LONGER VALID. HERE IS THE UPDATED LINK TO THE PDF. http://candicemiller.house.gov/pdf/hr3200.pdf
I am well aware of the typeo in this video, I apologize but It's too late to fix it now.
Healthcare is only a powerful stepping stone to their government takeover plan. Open your eyes America, they don't care what "we the people" want or need, they simply want control.
Aug. 2009
Original Bill (Video) :This is a point by point description (A guide not the actual reading of the bill!) of the Government Healthcare plan taken from the ACTUAL proposed bill H.R.3200http://candicemiller.house.gov/pdf/hr3200.pdf
Though not opposed to healthcare reform most Americans do not want this KIND of reform which is a dangerous UN-AMERICAN UNCONSTITUTIONAL We want reform that makes sense and that is helpful for all not a destructive death warrant for the unborn and the elderly. We want government to stay out of our personal life decisions period. This is America !!
SC
Thursday, March 31, 2011
George Soros making a move to control food and grain production
From: Examiner
George Soros making a move to control food and grain production
http://www.examiner.com/finance-examiner-in-national/george-soros-making-a-move-to-control-food-and-grain-production?fb_comment=31435366
Financier and progressive activist George Soros is formulating a move to control food and grain production by purchasing grain elevators in late March in several parts of the United States through his subsidiary company Gavilon Grain. With some purchases made on March 29th, Soros will become the third largest grain company behind Cargill, and Archer-Daniels Midland.
With strong ties to the Obama administration, Soros now has both the economic, and political clout to begin consolidation of purchasing and shipping domestic agriculture around the world. . . . .
George Soros making a move to control food and grain production
http://www.examiner.com/finance-examiner-in-national/george-soros-making-a-move-to-control-food-and-grain-production?fb_comment=31435366
Financier and progressive activist George Soros is formulating a move to control food and grain production by purchasing grain elevators in late March in several parts of the United States through his subsidiary company Gavilon Grain. With some purchases made on March 29th, Soros will become the third largest grain company behind Cargill, and Archer-Daniels Midland.
With strong ties to the Obama administration, Soros now has both the economic, and political clout to begin consolidation of purchasing and shipping domestic agriculture around the world. . . . .
VERY SERIOUS WARNING...OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT.
From: Citzens 4 Freedom
VERY SERIOUS WARNING...OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT.
http://www.citizens4freedom.com/Articles/tabid/1387/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/4161/categoryId/10/VERY-SERIOUS-WARNINGOBAMA-FINDS-LEGAL-WAY-AROUND-THE-2ND-AMENDMENT-AND-USES-IT.aspx
On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States.
On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. . . .
VERY SERIOUS WARNING...OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT.
http://www.citizens4freedom.com/Articles/tabid/1387/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/4161/categoryId/10/VERY-SERIOUS-WARNINGOBAMA-FINDS-LEGAL-WAY-AROUND-THE-2ND-AMENDMENT-AND-USES-IT.aspx
On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States.
On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. . . .
Friday, March 25, 2011
NANCY PELOSI'S USE OF USAF AIR CRAFT
Our Past Speaker Of The House - This is just direct costs, no maintaince, overhaul,depreciation.
The FACTS ARE IN!
As a result of a Judicial Watch filing under the Freedom of Information Act, the USAF released documents detailing House Speaker Pelosi's use of United States Air Force aircraft between March 2009 and June 2010. The data are published in the Judicial Watch Verdict of December 2010, Volume 16, Issue 12.
Here are the main highlights revealed by the USAF. Keep in mind that all the data below relate to United States Air Force aircraft used by one woman over a sixteen month period. Several of these flights included Ms Pelosi's guests such as grown children, grandchildren, various in-laws, friends, and hangers-on. Over 95% of the trips were between the west coast and Washington, DC or what we might call a commute between home and the office.
READ it and WEEP!!
Total trips: 85 trips over a 68 week period or 1.25 average trips per week.Total mileage: 206,264 miles or 2,427 average miles per tripTotal flying time: 428.6 hours or an average of 5 hrs per tripCost to the taxpayers: $2,100,744.59 or $27,715.00 per trip or $1,285,162.00 per yearCost of in flight food and alcohol: $101,429.14 or $1,193.00 per trip or $62,051.00 per year.
On one junket to Baghdad, according to the Air Force report, she had the aircraft bar stocked with Johnny Walker Red Scotch, Grey Goose Vodka, E&J Brandy, Bailey's Irish Creme, Maker's Mark whiskey, Courvoisier Cognac, Bacardi Rum, Jim Beam Whiskey, Beefeater Gin, Dewars Scotch, Bombay Sapphire Gin, Jack Daniels Whiskey, Corona Beer and several varieties of wine. This was obviously a very important "gubment bidness" trip.
Evidence generally speaks for itself, and in Ms. Pelosi's case it speaks the language of abuse and (evidently) a serious familial drinking problem, for in a single year she and her spawn drank an amount in excess of the net income of the average employed American! When she said, "... if the stimulus doesn't pass, five hundred million people might lose their jobs...", I thought she was unintentionally revealing her ignorance. I'm now more inclined to think she was pickled.
Even though she can no longer abuse the USAF, she can either fly on her broom, or fly Southwest Airlines, where bags fly free.
If you are an AMERICAN citizen it is YOUR DUTY to PASS THIS INFORMATION ON! ! ! !
The FACTS ARE IN!
As a result of a Judicial Watch filing under the Freedom of Information Act, the USAF released documents detailing House Speaker Pelosi's use of United States Air Force aircraft between March 2009 and June 2010. The data are published in the Judicial Watch Verdict of December 2010, Volume 16, Issue 12.
Here are the main highlights revealed by the USAF. Keep in mind that all the data below relate to United States Air Force aircraft used by one woman over a sixteen month period. Several of these flights included Ms Pelosi's guests such as grown children, grandchildren, various in-laws, friends, and hangers-on. Over 95% of the trips were between the west coast and Washington, DC or what we might call a commute between home and the office.
READ it and WEEP!!
Total trips: 85 trips over a 68 week period or 1.25 average trips per week.Total mileage: 206,264 miles or 2,427 average miles per tripTotal flying time: 428.6 hours or an average of 5 hrs per tripCost to the taxpayers: $2,100,744.59 or $27,715.00 per trip or $1,285,162.00 per yearCost of in flight food and alcohol: $101,429.14 or $1,193.00 per trip or $62,051.00 per year.
On one junket to Baghdad, according to the Air Force report, she had the aircraft bar stocked with Johnny Walker Red Scotch, Grey Goose Vodka, E&J Brandy, Bailey's Irish Creme, Maker's Mark whiskey, Courvoisier Cognac, Bacardi Rum, Jim Beam Whiskey, Beefeater Gin, Dewars Scotch, Bombay Sapphire Gin, Jack Daniels Whiskey, Corona Beer and several varieties of wine. This was obviously a very important "gubment bidness" trip.
Evidence generally speaks for itself, and in Ms. Pelosi's case it speaks the language of abuse and (evidently) a serious familial drinking problem, for in a single year she and her spawn drank an amount in excess of the net income of the average employed American! When she said, "... if the stimulus doesn't pass, five hundred million people might lose their jobs...", I thought she was unintentionally revealing her ignorance. I'm now more inclined to think she was pickled.
Even though she can no longer abuse the USAF, she can either fly on her broom, or fly Southwest Airlines, where bags fly free.
If you are an AMERICAN citizen it is YOUR DUTY to PASS THIS INFORMATION ON! ! ! !
Friday, March 18, 2011
The foolishness of the environmental movement and congress!
5:18 YouTube video
The foolishness of the environmental movement and congress!
http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=7327849825798164199
Congress's energy bill bans incandescent light bulbs by 2014, and requires Americans to buy compact fluorescent bulbs. Those are called CFLs.
The foolishness of the environmental movement and congress!
http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=7327849825798164199
Congress's energy bill bans incandescent light bulbs by 2014, and requires Americans to buy compact fluorescent bulbs. Those are called CFLs.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
WE STILL HOLD THESE TRUTHS
Here are some EXCELLENT videos to watch when you have time:
We Still Hold These Truths (19 min)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaF1cpsDjf0
We STILL Hold These Truths: Self-Government & the Founders' Constitution 3-2-10 (58 min)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcC02ZI637Q
Core Principles of American Founding: We Still Hold These Truths (2 min)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
We Still Hold These Truths (19 min)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaF1cpsDjf0
We STILL Hold These Truths: Self-Government & the Founders' Constitution 3-2-10 (58 min)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcC02ZI637Q
Core Principles of American Founding: We Still Hold These Truths (2 min)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Obama outlines plan for gun reform
From: CNN Political Ticker
Obama outlines plan for gun reform
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/13/obama-outlines-plan-for-gun-reform/?hpt=Sbin
Obama outlines plan for gun reform
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/13/obama-outlines-plan-for-gun-reform/?hpt=Sbin
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Photos (& Video) Of Jewish Family Slaughtered By ‘Religion Of Peace’
From: Now the End Begins
Photos Of Jewish Family Slaughtered By ‘Religion Of Peace’
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=3188
3:30 YouTube Video
Israeli family of 5 killed in terror attack [HQ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msXNcJA76_8
Photos Of Jewish Family Slaughtered By ‘Religion Of Peace’
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=3188
3:30 YouTube Video
Israeli family of 5 killed in terror attack [HQ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msXNcJA76_8
Friday, March 11, 2011
DO ALL RELIGIONS PREACH VIOLENCE?
By Scott Gout
1. Christians, Jews, and Muslims all recognize THE OLD TESTAMENT as a holy book.
2. In the New Testament, Jesus is asked about "what about an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." (In in other words, he is asking what about what the Old Testament tells us to do about people when they do bad things, ma...ybe TO us) Matthew 5. Jesus replies, Love your neighbor. Pressed on this, he says if one is wronged, to turn the other cheek. If one is wronged again, turn the other cheek also. Obviously is has repudiated violence. Not that sins listed in the Old Testament are no longer sins, just that God no longer commands violence as was proscribed in the Old Testament. He is saying "Let God handle it". Jesus is letting everyone know that if they commit violence, it is NOT in the name of Jesus or his Father. The Jewish faith underwent a similar process.
3. The Muslim faith underwent no such repudiation of violence. Yes, it is easy to take a line or two out of context. But the writings that constitute the Islamic faith are filled, literally, from beginning end with not only allegories (Jesus's talks are filled with allegories), but out and out COMMANDS to harm others outside the faith. The Qu'ran, the Sura, and the Hadiths literally are filled from beginning to end with these types of things.
4. Regardless if whether we believe any of the ancient texts or not, no Christians of any number actively preach the type of violence that is present in the Old Testament. Yes, people like to bring up the wackos who protest at funerals and such and point to them as an example of all Christians, but this is just a fake smear. I would guess that 99% or more true Christians would not approve of such a thing, just as they would not approve of suicide bombings, headings, and such. The Christian religion has become "civilized". Yes, Christians do bad things, or sin. No true Christian will ever say that they are perfect. We've all met Christians that we don't like. But I've never had one try to beheaded me or gang rape a member of my family. Just sayin'. So let's keep things in perspective-- no one is perfect. All the more reason for a Savior. SO by definition, a sin CANNOT be commanded by God to be carried out by ANY follower. A SIN is NEVER done in the Name of the Christian God. Jesus NEVER commands us to sin or hurt anyone else. Never.
5. Islam has not gone through this process of becoming "civilized". Actually, the writings of Muhammad in the Qu`ran, the Hadiths, and the Sura are, if anything, much more violent than the Old Testament.
6. Why has it NEVER been reported having heard a Christian yell "Jesus is great" as they blow themselves up? Huh? It just doesn't happen. Muslims yell "Allahu Akbar" all the time as they blow themselves up or kill innocent people.
7. Well, you might say--it's not ALL Muslims. Well, compared to Christians, who I'm sure would DISPROVE of suicide bombing by 99% plus, again, Muslims in Egypt support it by 54%. You can complain all you want about sample size, but the results of this poll are right in line with polls done right along. 33% of Muslim students BORN and RAISED in Great Britain are sympathetic to suicide bombing. Again, why?? Could it be what they have been taught-- Islam???
8. Bottom line--when we are considering who to let into our Country, I'll take my chances with Africans, Russians, Chinese, Indian, South American, and, yes, Mexican (legally) before I will with any Muslim. Sorry, 46% just isn't a very good batting average as far as hoping someone doesn't want to kill you.
9. Does that mean that all Muslims here want to kill us?? No--absolutely not. Muslims never start push their weight around against the indigenous population until they reach between 5%-10%. Look at what is going on in Great Britain (5%), France, Germany, and the Netherlands (all 6%-8%). The Muslims that entered those countries NEVER intended to assimilate. Now they are in various stages of agitating for Sharia law in all those countries. Sharia law is incompatible with Western Democracy. Muslims have much larger families than the indigenous Europeans, so I'm sure we'll get to see how that goes (the Islamization of Europe). I'll be the first admit it if it doesn't happen and I'm wrong, but I don't think so. These are their stated aims all along.
10. The funny thing is, they tell is what they're gonna do, but we don't believe them! Talk about connecting the dots LOL. So you can read on it. The leaders of ALL FOUR of these countries have declared Multiculturalism a dismal failure.
Again, this is just the Facts.
What happens when Muslims reach 30% or so?? See the Sudan for that one.
11. So--bottom line--whether we believe it or not (the Qu'ran) doesn't matter.
Millions of people, many hundreds of millions, take it Literally. I don't care what you or I think. If they take its commandant literally, that makes them dangerous.
Again, facts are stubborn things.
12. Where are these people getting these barbaric ideas?? NOT Christians. They are being taught this from their holy books.
If it makes you feel better, go ahead and say "Islam has been hijacked". That just apologized for it, though and sweeps the problem under the rug. A better question is, is if this is what most Muslims believe, why don't most people in the U.S. know it? Surely Big Brother would have told us, right?? That's a good one, too.
Well, I am a much better tester if nothing else as I ate my pizza. Back to work.
13. So, I don't do this to preach hatred. Just for educational purposes. I know where you are coming from. I used to be a Liberal and thought the same things that you are saying. I also found out that there are way too many college courses that engage in the touchy feely conflict resolution hogwash (which can work with two civilized people who are willing to submit to the system) but it does not work for this. People have to be reasonable to an extent. People who beheaded, beat their wives, practice genital mutilation, pedophilia, are not. Very few classes nowadays teach critical thinking, which is a shame.
14. So to borrow from the naive bumper sticker, "You cannot coexist with people who want to kill you."
Editors Note: Check out the following website for more information: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
1. Christians, Jews, and Muslims all recognize THE OLD TESTAMENT as a holy book.
2. In the New Testament, Jesus is asked about "what about an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." (In in other words, he is asking what about what the Old Testament tells us to do about people when they do bad things, ma...ybe TO us) Matthew 5. Jesus replies, Love your neighbor. Pressed on this, he says if one is wronged, to turn the other cheek. If one is wronged again, turn the other cheek also. Obviously is has repudiated violence. Not that sins listed in the Old Testament are no longer sins, just that God no longer commands violence as was proscribed in the Old Testament. He is saying "Let God handle it". Jesus is letting everyone know that if they commit violence, it is NOT in the name of Jesus or his Father. The Jewish faith underwent a similar process.
3. The Muslim faith underwent no such repudiation of violence. Yes, it is easy to take a line or two out of context. But the writings that constitute the Islamic faith are filled, literally, from beginning end with not only allegories (Jesus's talks are filled with allegories), but out and out COMMANDS to harm others outside the faith. The Qu'ran, the Sura, and the Hadiths literally are filled from beginning to end with these types of things.
4. Regardless if whether we believe any of the ancient texts or not, no Christians of any number actively preach the type of violence that is present in the Old Testament. Yes, people like to bring up the wackos who protest at funerals and such and point to them as an example of all Christians, but this is just a fake smear. I would guess that 99% or more true Christians would not approve of such a thing, just as they would not approve of suicide bombings, headings, and such. The Christian religion has become "civilized". Yes, Christians do bad things, or sin. No true Christian will ever say that they are perfect. We've all met Christians that we don't like. But I've never had one try to beheaded me or gang rape a member of my family. Just sayin'. So let's keep things in perspective-- no one is perfect. All the more reason for a Savior. SO by definition, a sin CANNOT be commanded by God to be carried out by ANY follower. A SIN is NEVER done in the Name of the Christian God. Jesus NEVER commands us to sin or hurt anyone else. Never.
5. Islam has not gone through this process of becoming "civilized". Actually, the writings of Muhammad in the Qu`ran, the Hadiths, and the Sura are, if anything, much more violent than the Old Testament.
6. Why has it NEVER been reported having heard a Christian yell "Jesus is great" as they blow themselves up? Huh? It just doesn't happen. Muslims yell "Allahu Akbar" all the time as they blow themselves up or kill innocent people.
7. Well, you might say--it's not ALL Muslims. Well, compared to Christians, who I'm sure would DISPROVE of suicide bombing by 99% plus, again, Muslims in Egypt support it by 54%. You can complain all you want about sample size, but the results of this poll are right in line with polls done right along. 33% of Muslim students BORN and RAISED in Great Britain are sympathetic to suicide bombing. Again, why?? Could it be what they have been taught-- Islam???
8. Bottom line--when we are considering who to let into our Country, I'll take my chances with Africans, Russians, Chinese, Indian, South American, and, yes, Mexican (legally) before I will with any Muslim. Sorry, 46% just isn't a very good batting average as far as hoping someone doesn't want to kill you.
9. Does that mean that all Muslims here want to kill us?? No--absolutely not. Muslims never start push their weight around against the indigenous population until they reach between 5%-10%. Look at what is going on in Great Britain (5%), France, Germany, and the Netherlands (all 6%-8%). The Muslims that entered those countries NEVER intended to assimilate. Now they are in various stages of agitating for Sharia law in all those countries. Sharia law is incompatible with Western Democracy. Muslims have much larger families than the indigenous Europeans, so I'm sure we'll get to see how that goes (the Islamization of Europe). I'll be the first admit it if it doesn't happen and I'm wrong, but I don't think so. These are their stated aims all along.
10. The funny thing is, they tell is what they're gonna do, but we don't believe them! Talk about connecting the dots LOL. So you can read on it. The leaders of ALL FOUR of these countries have declared Multiculturalism a dismal failure.
Again, this is just the Facts.
What happens when Muslims reach 30% or so?? See the Sudan for that one.
11. So--bottom line--whether we believe it or not (the Qu'ran) doesn't matter.
Millions of people, many hundreds of millions, take it Literally. I don't care what you or I think. If they take its commandant literally, that makes them dangerous.
Again, facts are stubborn things.
12. Where are these people getting these barbaric ideas?? NOT Christians. They are being taught this from their holy books.
If it makes you feel better, go ahead and say "Islam has been hijacked". That just apologized for it, though and sweeps the problem under the rug. A better question is, is if this is what most Muslims believe, why don't most people in the U.S. know it? Surely Big Brother would have told us, right?? That's a good one, too.
Well, I am a much better tester if nothing else as I ate my pizza. Back to work.
13. So, I don't do this to preach hatred. Just for educational purposes. I know where you are coming from. I used to be a Liberal and thought the same things that you are saying. I also found out that there are way too many college courses that engage in the touchy feely conflict resolution hogwash (which can work with two civilized people who are willing to submit to the system) but it does not work for this. People have to be reasonable to an extent. People who beheaded, beat their wives, practice genital mutilation, pedophilia, are not. Very few classes nowadays teach critical thinking, which is a shame.
14. So to borrow from the naive bumper sticker, "You cannot coexist with people who want to kill you."
Editors Note: Check out the following website for more information: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
Friday, February 25, 2011
30,000 Scientist Sue Al Gore For Global Fraud: No Global Warming – NASA: Planet Cooling Since 2003
30,000 Scientist Sue Al Gore For Global Fraud: No Global Warming – NASA: Planet Cooling Since 2003
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/09/24/gore-is-a-liar-no-global-warming-nasa-planet-cooling-since-2003/
Global temperatures peaked in 1998 and have been cooling each year since. The global warming and subsequent cooling were even predictable due to hundreds of years of historical trends and observation of the impact of variations in solar activity on global temperature. . . . .
This article contains 8 excellent videos ranging in time from 1 minute to 11 minutes.
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/09/24/gore-is-a-liar-no-global-warming-nasa-planet-cooling-since-2003/
Global temperatures peaked in 1998 and have been cooling each year since. The global warming and subsequent cooling were even predictable due to hundreds of years of historical trends and observation of the impact of variations in solar activity on global temperature. . . . .
This article contains 8 excellent videos ranging in time from 1 minute to 11 minutes.
Monday, January 24, 2011
BANKRUPTCIY 101
You think the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are costing us too much? Read this:
We have been hammered with the propaganda that it was the Middle East war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us.
I now find that to be RIDICULOUS.
I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read... so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. URL's included; for fact verification...
1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments. Verify at: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8
2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English! Verify at:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt..0..HTML
5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.CNN.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
http://transcripts/..cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML%3E;%A0
8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.
Verify at: http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.HTML
9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSC%20RI%20PTS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US Verify at:
http://transcripts.cnn..com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt..01.HTML
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt..01.HTML%3E;
http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml%3E;%C2%A0% 20w.drdsk.com/articleshtml
The total cost is a whopping ...$338.3 Billion Dollars A YEAR...
AND IF YOU'RE LIKE ME, HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS $338,300,000,000.00 WHICH WOULD BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.
HOW DOES THE U.S. CONGRESS KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH LETTING THIS HAPPEN YEAR AFTER YEAR?!?!? THEY KEEP GETTING RE-ELECTED !!!
We have been hammered with the propaganda that it was the Middle East war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us.
I now find that to be RIDICULOUS.
I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read... so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. URL's included; for fact verification...
1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments. Verify at: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8
2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English! Verify at:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt..0..HTML
5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.CNN.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
http://transcripts/..cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML%3E;%A0
8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.
Verify at: http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.HTML
9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSC%20RI%20PTS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US Verify at:
http://transcripts.cnn..com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt..01.HTML
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt..01.HTML%3E;
http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml%3E;%C2%A0
The total cost is a whopping ...$338.3 Billion Dollars A YEAR...
AND IF YOU'RE LIKE ME, HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS $338,300,000,000.00 WHICH WOULD BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.
HOW DOES THE U.S. CONGRESS KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH LETTING THIS HAPPEN YEAR AFTER YEAR?!?!? THEY KEEP GETTING RE-ELECTED !!!
Thursday, December 2, 2010
US Ready to Back Bigger EU Stability Fund: Official
From: CNBC
US Ready to Back Bigger EU Stability Fund: Official
http://www.cnbc.com/id/40454469
The United States would be ready to support the extension of the European Financial Stability Facility via an extra commitment of money from the International Monetary Fund, a U.S. official told Reuters on Wednesday.
"There are a lot of people talking about that. I think the European Commission has talked about that," said the U.S. official, commenting on enlarging the 750 billion euro ($980 billion) EU/IMF European stability fund. "It is up to the Europeans. We will certainly support using the IMF in these circumstances."
"There are obviously some severe market problems," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. "In May, it was Greece. This is Ireland and Portugal. If there is contagion that's a huge problem for the global economy." . . . .
US Ready to Back Bigger EU Stability Fund: Official
http://www.cnbc.com/id/40454469
The United States would be ready to support the extension of the European Financial Stability Facility via an extra commitment of money from the International Monetary Fund, a U.S. official told Reuters on Wednesday.
"There are a lot of people talking about that. I think the European Commission has talked about that," said the U.S. official, commenting on enlarging the 750 billion euro ($980 billion) EU/IMF European stability fund. "It is up to the Europeans. We will certainly support using the IMF in these circumstances."
"There are obviously some severe market problems," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. "In May, it was Greece. This is Ireland and Portugal. If there is contagion that's a huge problem for the global economy." . . . .
Reid Angers GOP by Pushing Four Versions of DREAM Act Without Hearing
From: Fox News
Reid Angers GOP by Pushing Four Versions of DREAM Act Without Hearing
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/01/reid-angers-gop-pushing-versions-dream-act-hearing/
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pushed four different versions of the controversial immigration bill known as the DREAM Act without a hearing on any of them, drawing outrage from the top Republican on the committee that would have handled the package.
The Nevada senator, who narrowly escaped a defeat in the November election, has pursued an unusual approach to advancing the bill that gives young illegal immigrants who attend college or join the military a pathway to legal status.
Since September, his deputy Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., has introduced four slightly different versions all bearing the same name. Reid has moved them all to the calendar -- he appears to be teeing up for a test vote, which could happen sometime later this week, on the latest version introduced on Tuesday. . . . .
Reid Angers GOP by Pushing Four Versions of DREAM Act Without Hearing
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/01/reid-angers-gop-pushing-versions-dream-act-hearing/
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pushed four different versions of the controversial immigration bill known as the DREAM Act without a hearing on any of them, drawing outrage from the top Republican on the committee that would have handled the package.
The Nevada senator, who narrowly escaped a defeat in the November election, has pursued an unusual approach to advancing the bill that gives young illegal immigrants who attend college or join the military a pathway to legal status.
Since September, his deputy Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., has introduced four slightly different versions all bearing the same name. Reid has moved them all to the calendar -- he appears to be teeing up for a test vote, which could happen sometime later this week, on the latest version introduced on Tuesday. . . . .
More on Senate Bill S 510
From: Natural News
Top ten lies about Senate Bill 510
http://www.naturalnews.com/030587_Senate_Bill_510_Food_Safety.html#ixzz16pkYVMPX
The Food Safety Modernization Act looks like it's headed to become law. It's being hailed as a "breakthrough" achievement in food safety, and it would hand vast new powers and funding to the FDA so that it can clean up the food supply and protect all Americans from food-borne pathogens.
There's just one problem with all this: It's all a big lie.
Here are the ten biggest lies that have been promoted about S.510 by the U.S. Congress, the food industry giants and the mainstream media: . . . . .
*************************************************************************
From: Natural News
S 510 Food Safety bill now dead in the water due to blue slip mistake
http://www.naturalnews.com/030588_Food_Safety_bill_blue_slip.html
It is now being revealed that US Senators slipped up in a big way when passing the Food Safety Modernization Act on Tuesday: They added what are effectively "new taxes" into the bill, and according to the U.S. Constitution, only the House of Representatives can initiate legislation requiring new taxes.
Thus, the House is now obliged to give this food safety legislation the so-called "blue slip," meaning that it rejects the law and sends it back to the Senate for yet another vote. This would take time and effort, of course, and the Democrats have very little of either remaining in their lame duck session.
As explained on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_slip):. . . .
************************************************************************
From: Roll Call
House May Block Food Safety Bill Over Senate Error
http://www.rollcall.com/news/-201012-1.html
A food safety bill that has burned up precious days of the Senate’s lame-duck session appears headed back to the chamber because Democrats violated a constitutional provision requiring that tax provisions originate in the House.
By pre-empting the House’s tax-writing authority, Senate Democrats appear to have touched off a power struggle with members of their own party in the House. The Senate passed the bill Tuesday, sending it to the House, but House Democrats are expected to use a procedure known as “blue slipping” to block the bill, according to House and Senate GOP aides. . . . .
Top ten lies about Senate Bill 510
http://www.naturalnews.com/030587_Senate_Bill_510_Food_Safety.html#ixzz16pkYVMPX
The Food Safety Modernization Act looks like it's headed to become law. It's being hailed as a "breakthrough" achievement in food safety, and it would hand vast new powers and funding to the FDA so that it can clean up the food supply and protect all Americans from food-borne pathogens.
There's just one problem with all this: It's all a big lie.
Here are the ten biggest lies that have been promoted about S.510 by the U.S. Congress, the food industry giants and the mainstream media: . . . . .
*************************************************************************
From: Natural News
S 510 Food Safety bill now dead in the water due to blue slip mistake
http://www.naturalnews.com/030588_Food_Safety_bill_blue_slip.html
It is now being revealed that US Senators slipped up in a big way when passing the Food Safety Modernization Act on Tuesday: They added what are effectively "new taxes" into the bill, and according to the U.S. Constitution, only the House of Representatives can initiate legislation requiring new taxes.
Thus, the House is now obliged to give this food safety legislation the so-called "blue slip," meaning that it rejects the law and sends it back to the Senate for yet another vote. This would take time and effort, of course, and the Democrats have very little of either remaining in their lame duck session.
As explained on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_slip):. . . .
************************************************************************
From: Roll Call
House May Block Food Safety Bill Over Senate Error
http://www.rollcall.com/news/-201012-1.html
A food safety bill that has burned up precious days of the Senate’s lame-duck session appears headed back to the chamber because Democrats violated a constitutional provision requiring that tax provisions originate in the House.
By pre-empting the House’s tax-writing authority, Senate Democrats appear to have touched off a power struggle with members of their own party in the House. The Senate passed the bill Tuesday, sending it to the House, but House Democrats are expected to use a procedure known as “blue slipping” to block the bill, according to House and Senate GOP aides. . . . .
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
GOP Rep. Buyer Blasts Acting Dem Speaker: "This is why the People have Thrown You Out"
From: Resist Net / 2:57 video
GOP Rep. Buyer Blasts Acting Dem Speaker: "This is why the People have Thrown You Out"
http://www.resistnet.com/video/video/show?id=2600775%3AVideo%3A2957485&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_video
GOP Rep. Buyer Blasts Acting Dem Speaker: "This is why the People have Thrown You Out"
http://www.resistnet.com/video/video/show?id=2600775%3AVideo%3A2957485&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_video
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Monday, November 29, 2010
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Friday, November 26, 2010
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Monday, November 22, 2010
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Friday, November 19, 2010
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Democrats to Barack Obama: Hang tough on Bush tax cuts
From: Politico
Democrats to Barack Obama: Hang tough on Bush tax cuts
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45317.html
When the looming battle over Bush tax cuts comes up during their meeting at the White House Thursday morning, congressional Democrats are likely to pose a simple question to President Barack Obama: What is your strategy?
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) have already made it clear to Obama – in a conference call Monday – that they want him to establish a coherent and tough bargaining position to deal with the GOP’s united support for an extension of all tax cuts, according to House and Senate sources familiar with the call. . . . .
Democrats to Barack Obama: Hang tough on Bush tax cuts
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45317.html
When the looming battle over Bush tax cuts comes up during their meeting at the White House Thursday morning, congressional Democrats are likely to pose a simple question to President Barack Obama: What is your strategy?
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) have already made it clear to Obama – in a conference call Monday – that they want him to establish a coherent and tough bargaining position to deal with the GOP’s united support for an extension of all tax cuts, according to House and Senate sources familiar with the call. . . . .
Sen. Rockefeller: FCC Should Take FOX News, MSNBC Off Airwaves
From: Real Clear Politics / 1:05 video
Sen. Rockefeller: FCC Should Take FOX News, MSNBC Off Airwaves
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/11/17/sen_rockefeller_fcc_should_take_fox_news_msnbc_off_airwaves.html
Sen. Rockefeller: FCC Should Take FOX News, MSNBC Off Airwaves
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/11/17/sen_rockefeller_fcc_should_take_fox_news_msnbc_off_airwaves.html
Soros advises Obama to use forceful measures to override the will of the people
From: Red, White, and Blue News
Soros advises Obama to use forceful measures to override the will of the people
http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=12336
George Soros funds the Center for American Progress, which has been characterized as Barack Obama’s Ideas Factory. John Podesta, its head, led the transition team when Barack Obama became President. The Center has also become a hiring hall for the Obama team, filling its positions with former employees (among these was controversial Van Jones — who now is back at the Center).
Apparently, George Soros and his Center are upset that the American people placed a roadblock in their plans when we rose up and painted the nation red. The Center now is providing a blueprint of ways Barack Obama can do an end run around the people’s will by resorting to methods that will strike many of us as being improper-to say the least. Relying on executive orders, interpretation of regulations, rule -making and the like they are collectively a recipe for even more power being assumed by President Obama.
From Tuesday’s Politico Playbook:
[The] Center for American Progress today is releasing a report, “Power of the President,” proposing 30 executive actions the president can take to advance progressive change in the areas of energy, the economy, health care, education, foreign policy, and national security. “The following authorities can be used to ensure progress on key issues facing the country today: Executive orders, Rulemaking, Agency management, Convening and creating public-private partnerships , Commanding the armed forces, Diplomacy. . . . .
Soros advises Obama to use forceful measures to override the will of the people
http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=12336
George Soros funds the Center for American Progress, which has been characterized as Barack Obama’s Ideas Factory. John Podesta, its head, led the transition team when Barack Obama became President. The Center has also become a hiring hall for the Obama team, filling its positions with former employees (among these was controversial Van Jones — who now is back at the Center).
Apparently, George Soros and his Center are upset that the American people placed a roadblock in their plans when we rose up and painted the nation red. The Center now is providing a blueprint of ways Barack Obama can do an end run around the people’s will by resorting to methods that will strike many of us as being improper-to say the least. Relying on executive orders, interpretation of regulations, rule -making and the like they are collectively a recipe for even more power being assumed by President Obama.
From Tuesday’s Politico Playbook:
[The] Center for American Progress today is releasing a report, “Power of the President,” proposing 30 executive actions the president can take to advance progressive change in the areas of energy, the economy, health care, education, foreign policy, and national security. “The following authorities can be used to ensure progress on key issues facing the country today: Executive orders, Rulemaking, Agency management, Convening and creating public-private partnerships , Commanding the armed forces, Diplomacy. . . . .
Two New Websites Posted
We have posted 2 new websites in the side bar:
Under "Educational Websites," we have added "Open Congress" which tracks Bills, Senators, Representatives, Issues, Committees, etc.
Under "Islam Websites," we have added "Pamela Kafir Liner Tellitlikeitis" posts good articles about Islam, Sharia Law and the Caliphate.
Under "Educational Websites," we have added "Open Congress" which tracks Bills, Senators, Representatives, Issues, Committees, etc.
Under "Islam Websites," we have added "Pamela Kafir Liner Tellitlikeitis" posts good articles about Islam, Sharia Law and the Caliphate.
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
The Perfect Storm… WESTBORO CULT to Picket Dearbornistan Islamic Center — Nov.18th
From: Right Net Work
The Perfect Storm… WESTBORO CULT to Picket Dearbornistan Islamic Center — Nov.18th
http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2010/11/the-perfect-storm-westboro-baptist-church-to-picket-dearborn-islamic-center-nov-18th/
Get your popcorn…
The God hates Fags people will protest at the Islamic Center in Dearbornistan tomorrow. . . . . .
The Perfect Storm… WESTBORO CULT to Picket Dearbornistan Islamic Center — Nov.18th
http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2010/11/the-perfect-storm-westboro-baptist-church-to-picket-dearborn-islamic-center-nov-18th/
Get your popcorn…
The God hates Fags people will protest at the Islamic Center in Dearbornistan tomorrow. . . . . .
Senate Bill S 510
From: Resist Net
Senate Bill S 510 Food Safety Modernization Act vote imminent: Would outlaw gardening and saving seeds
http://www.resistnet.com/forum/topic/show?id=2600775%3ATopic%3A2924944&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
Senate Bill 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act, has
been called "the most dangerous bill in the history of the United States
of America." It would grant the U.S. government new authority over the
public's right to grow, trade and transport any foods. This would give
Big brother the power to regulate the tomato plants in your backyard. It
would grant them the power to arrest and imprison people selling
cucumbers at farmer's markets. It would criminalize the transporting of
organic produce if you don't comply with the authoritarian rules of the
federal government.
"It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one's choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God." - Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower (http://shivchopra.com/?page_id=2). . . .
**************************************************************************
OTHER INFORMATION:
Here are a couple more websites on Senate Bill S 510:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s510/show
http://www.examiner.com/wellness-in-atlanta/government-wants-to-restrict-you-growing-food-your-own-garden
***********************************************************************
MORE INFORMATION: This was posted on our Face Book page by Lori Gillespie:
S 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010, may be the most dangerous bill in the history of the US. It is to our food what the bailout was to our economy, only we can live without money.
“If accepted [S 510] would preclude the publi...c’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one’s choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God.” ~Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower
It is similar to what India faced with imposition of the salt tax during British rule, only S 510 extends control over all food in the US, violating the fundamental human right to food.
Monsanto says it has no interest in the bill and would not benefit from it, but Monsanto’s Michael Taylor who gave us rBGH and unregulated genetically modified (GM) organisms, appears to have designed it and is waiting as an appointed Food Czar to the FDA (a position unapproved by Congress) to administer the agency it would create — without judicial review — if it passes. S 510 would give Monsanto unlimited power over all US seed, food supplements, food and farming.
History
In the 1990s, Bill Clinton introduced HACCP (Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Points) purportedly to deal with contamination in the meat industry. Clinton’s HACCP delighted the offending corporate (World Trade Organization “WTO”) meat packers since it allowed them to inspect themselves, eliminated thousands of local food processors (with no history of contamination), and centralized meat into their control. Monsanto promoted HACCP.
In 2008, Hillary Clinton, urged a powerful centralized food safety agency as part of her campaign for president. Her advisor was Mark Penn, CEO of Burson Marsteller*, a giant PR firm representing Monsanto. Clinton lost, but Clinton friends such as Rosa DeLauro, whose husband’s firm lists Monsanto as a progressive client and globalization as an area of expertise, introduced early versions of S 510.
S 510 fails on moral, social, economic, political, constitutional, and human survival grounds.
1. It puts all US food and all US farms under Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, in the event of contamination or an ill-defined emergency. It resembles the Kissinger Plan.
2. It would end US sovereignty over its own food supply by insisting on compliance with the WTO, thus threatening national security. It would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Instead, S 510 says:
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.
Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.
3. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into “the United States.” Since under that law, the US is a corporate entity and not a location, “entry of food into the US” covers food produced anywhere within the land mass of this country and “entering into” it by virtue of being produced.
4. It imposes Codex Alimentarius on the US, a global system of control over food. It allows the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the WTO to take control of every food on earth and remove access to natural food supplements. Its bizarre history and its expected impact in limiting access to adequate nutrition (while mandating GM food, GM animals, pesticides, hormones, irradiation of food, etc.) threatens all safe and organic food and health itself, since the world knows now it needs vitamins to survive, not just to treat illnesses.
5. It would remove the right to clean, store and thus own seed in the US, putting control of seeds in the hands of Monsanto and other multinationals, threatening US security. See Seeds – How to criminalize them, for more details.
6. It includes NAIS, an animal traceability program that threatens all small farmers and ranchers raising animals. The UN is participating through the WHO, FAO, WTO, and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in allowing mass slaughter of even heritage breeds of animals and without proof of disease. Biodiversity in farm animals is being wiped out to substitute genetically engineered animals on which corporations hold patents. Animal diseases can be falsely declared. S 510 includes the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), despite its corrupt involvement in the H1N1 scandal, which is now said to have been concocted by the corporations.
7. It extends a failed and destructive HACCP to all food, thus threatening to do to all local food production and farming what HACCP did to meat production – put it in corporate hands and worsen food safety.
8. It deconstructs what is left of the American economy. It takes agriculture and food, which are the cornerstone of all economies, out of the hands of the citizenry, and puts them under the total control of multinational corporations influencing the UN, WHO, FAO and WTO, with HHS, and CDC, acting as agents, with Homeland Security as the enforcer. The chance to rebuild the economy based on farming, ranching, gardens, food production, natural health, and all the jobs, tools and connected occupations would be eliminated.
9. It would allow the government to mandate antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse waste, pesticides and GMOs. This would industrialize every farm in the US, eliminate local organic farming, greatly increase global warming from increased use of oil-based products and long-distance delivery of foods, and make food even more unsafe. The five items listed — the Five Pillars of Food Safety — are precisely the items in the food supply which are the primary source of its danger.
10. It uses food crimes as the entry into police state power and control. The bill postpones defining all the regulations to be imposed; postpones defining crimes to be punished, postpones defining penalties to be applied. It removes fundamental constitutional protections from all citizens in the country, making them subject to a corporate tribunal with unlimited power and penalties, and without judicial review. It is (similar to C-6 in Canada) the end of Rule of Law in the US.
For further information, watch these videos:
Food Laws – Forcing people to globalize
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia-P4rL2IWc
State Imposed Violence … to snatch resources of ordinary people
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onw_PkVvpts&feature=related
Corporate Rule
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PwqUQ_HIlg&feature=related
Reclaiming Economies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXoJHG-er7A&feature=related
Oak snake image at Alfred B. Maclay Gardens State Park, Florida
http://snipurl.com/vrg6p
Senate Bill S 510 Food Safety Modernization Act vote imminent: Would outlaw gardening and saving seeds
http://www.resistnet.com/forum/topic/show?id=2600775%3ATopic%3A2924944&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic
Senate Bill 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act, has
been called "the most dangerous bill in the history of the United States
of America." It would grant the U.S. government new authority over the
public's right to grow, trade and transport any foods. This would give
Big brother the power to regulate the tomato plants in your backyard. It
would grant them the power to arrest and imprison people selling
cucumbers at farmer's markets. It would criminalize the transporting of
organic produce if you don't comply with the authoritarian rules of the
federal government.
"It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one's choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God." - Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower (http://shivchopra.com/?page_id=2). . . .
**************************************************************************
OTHER INFORMATION:
Here are a couple more websites on Senate Bill S 510:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s510/show
http://www.examiner.com/wellness-in-atlanta/government-wants-to-restrict-you-growing-food-your-own-garden
***********************************************************************
MORE INFORMATION: This was posted on our Face Book page by Lori Gillespie:
S 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010, may be the most dangerous bill in the history of the US. It is to our food what the bailout was to our economy, only we can live without money.
“If accepted [S 510] would preclude the publi...c’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one’s choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God.” ~Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower
It is similar to what India faced with imposition of the salt tax during British rule, only S 510 extends control over all food in the US, violating the fundamental human right to food.
Monsanto says it has no interest in the bill and would not benefit from it, but Monsanto’s Michael Taylor who gave us rBGH and unregulated genetically modified (GM) organisms, appears to have designed it and is waiting as an appointed Food Czar to the FDA (a position unapproved by Congress) to administer the agency it would create — without judicial review — if it passes. S 510 would give Monsanto unlimited power over all US seed, food supplements, food and farming.
History
In the 1990s, Bill Clinton introduced HACCP (Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Points) purportedly to deal with contamination in the meat industry. Clinton’s HACCP delighted the offending corporate (World Trade Organization “WTO”) meat packers since it allowed them to inspect themselves, eliminated thousands of local food processors (with no history of contamination), and centralized meat into their control. Monsanto promoted HACCP.
In 2008, Hillary Clinton, urged a powerful centralized food safety agency as part of her campaign for president. Her advisor was Mark Penn, CEO of Burson Marsteller*, a giant PR firm representing Monsanto. Clinton lost, but Clinton friends such as Rosa DeLauro, whose husband’s firm lists Monsanto as a progressive client and globalization as an area of expertise, introduced early versions of S 510.
S 510 fails on moral, social, economic, political, constitutional, and human survival grounds.
1. It puts all US food and all US farms under Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, in the event of contamination or an ill-defined emergency. It resembles the Kissinger Plan.
2. It would end US sovereignty over its own food supply by insisting on compliance with the WTO, thus threatening national security. It would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Instead, S 510 says:
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.
Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.
3. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into “the United States.” Since under that law, the US is a corporate entity and not a location, “entry of food into the US” covers food produced anywhere within the land mass of this country and “entering into” it by virtue of being produced.
4. It imposes Codex Alimentarius on the US, a global system of control over food. It allows the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the WTO to take control of every food on earth and remove access to natural food supplements. Its bizarre history and its expected impact in limiting access to adequate nutrition (while mandating GM food, GM animals, pesticides, hormones, irradiation of food, etc.) threatens all safe and organic food and health itself, since the world knows now it needs vitamins to survive, not just to treat illnesses.
5. It would remove the right to clean, store and thus own seed in the US, putting control of seeds in the hands of Monsanto and other multinationals, threatening US security. See Seeds – How to criminalize them, for more details.
6. It includes NAIS, an animal traceability program that threatens all small farmers and ranchers raising animals. The UN is participating through the WHO, FAO, WTO, and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in allowing mass slaughter of even heritage breeds of animals and without proof of disease. Biodiversity in farm animals is being wiped out to substitute genetically engineered animals on which corporations hold patents. Animal diseases can be falsely declared. S 510 includes the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), despite its corrupt involvement in the H1N1 scandal, which is now said to have been concocted by the corporations.
7. It extends a failed and destructive HACCP to all food, thus threatening to do to all local food production and farming what HACCP did to meat production – put it in corporate hands and worsen food safety.
8. It deconstructs what is left of the American economy. It takes agriculture and food, which are the cornerstone of all economies, out of the hands of the citizenry, and puts them under the total control of multinational corporations influencing the UN, WHO, FAO and WTO, with HHS, and CDC, acting as agents, with Homeland Security as the enforcer. The chance to rebuild the economy based on farming, ranching, gardens, food production, natural health, and all the jobs, tools and connected occupations would be eliminated.
9. It would allow the government to mandate antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse waste, pesticides and GMOs. This would industrialize every farm in the US, eliminate local organic farming, greatly increase global warming from increased use of oil-based products and long-distance delivery of foods, and make food even more unsafe. The five items listed — the Five Pillars of Food Safety — are precisely the items in the food supply which are the primary source of its danger.
10. It uses food crimes as the entry into police state power and control. The bill postpones defining all the regulations to be imposed; postpones defining crimes to be punished, postpones defining penalties to be applied. It removes fundamental constitutional protections from all citizens in the country, making them subject to a corporate tribunal with unlimited power and penalties, and without judicial review. It is (similar to C-6 in Canada) the end of Rule of Law in the US.
For further information, watch these videos:
Food Laws – Forcing people to globalize
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia-P4rL2IWc
State Imposed Violence … to snatch resources of ordinary people
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onw_PkVvpts&feature=related
Corporate Rule
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PwqUQ_HIlg&feature=related
Reclaiming Economies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXoJHG-er7A&feature=related
Oak snake image at Alfred B. Maclay Gardens State Park, Florida
http://snipurl.com/vrg6p
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Monday, November 15, 2010
Should the 25th amendment be invoked to remove Obama from office?
From: The Examiner
Should the 25th amendment be invoked to remove Obama from office?
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/should-the-25th-amendment-be-invoked-to-remove-obama-from-office
A Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Texas this year created a stir in the political world by insisting during the campaign that the 25 Amendment to the U.S. Constitution should be invoked to remove Obama from office.
Yes, the candidate was a Democrat. And yes, the candidate was a female African-American by the name of Kesha Rogers. Yet she made it a centerpiece of her campaign to call for the removal of Obama from office, not by impeachment, which would involve a lengthy process in Congress, but by invoking the 25th, which specifies how a sitting President can be removed immediately based upon the opinion of the Vice-President and Cabinet that he is unable to fulfill the duties of office. . . .
Should the 25th amendment be invoked to remove Obama from office?
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/should-the-25th-amendment-be-invoked-to-remove-obama-from-office
A Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Texas this year created a stir in the political world by insisting during the campaign that the 25 Amendment to the U.S. Constitution should be invoked to remove Obama from office.
Yes, the candidate was a Democrat. And yes, the candidate was a female African-American by the name of Kesha Rogers. Yet she made it a centerpiece of her campaign to call for the removal of Obama from office, not by impeachment, which would involve a lengthy process in Congress, but by invoking the 25th, which specifies how a sitting President can be removed immediately based upon the opinion of the Vice-President and Cabinet that he is unable to fulfill the duties of office. . . .
United States Supreme Court Will Soon Issue a Landmark Decision on the Validity of the Constitution
From: Breitbart
United States Supreme Court Will Soon Issue a Landmark Decision on the Validity of the Constitution
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20101113.CL01025
The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution. The Supreme Court will consider three petitions filed by William M. Windsor, a retired Atlanta, Georgia grandfather. The decision should be rendered by the end of the year. Unless The Supreme Court acts, federal judges will be free to void the Constitution.
The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court by Grandfather Windsor are:
Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges?
Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?
Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?
These questions are presented in three separate Petitions for Writ of Mandamus filed with The United States Supreme Court the first week of November 2010 (appeal numbers to-be-assigned). . . . .
United States Supreme Court Will Soon Issue a Landmark Decision on the Validity of the Constitution
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20101113.CL01025
The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution. The Supreme Court will consider three petitions filed by William M. Windsor, a retired Atlanta, Georgia grandfather. The decision should be rendered by the end of the year. Unless The Supreme Court acts, federal judges will be free to void the Constitution.
The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court by Grandfather Windsor are:
Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges?
Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?
Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?
These questions are presented in three separate Petitions for Writ of Mandamus filed with The United States Supreme Court the first week of November 2010 (appeal numbers to-be-assigned). . . . .
Muslim wars: A new beginning
From: The Washington Times
EDITORIAL: Muslim wars: A new beginning: Obama ignores the hard issues about Islam
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/10/muslim-wars-a-new-beginning/
Speaking from his boyhood home of Jakarta, Indonesia, yesterday, President Obama said, "America is not, and never will be, at war with Islam." His talking point misses the point because Islam is at war with America.
The White House billed the event as a follow-up to Mr. Obama's June 2009 Cairo speech "attempting to soothe historic tensions between America and Muslim communities around the world." The president reiterated the messages of his earlier address, in which he called for a "new beginning" in U.S.-Muslim relations. This new beginning, however, has run into the same old problems. After a brief burst of enthusiasm early in his first year, Mr. Obama's approval ratings in the Muslim world have sunk to those of his predecessor, George W. Bush, who launched wars against Muslim countries. . . . .
EDITORIAL: Muslim wars: A new beginning: Obama ignores the hard issues about Islam
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/10/muslim-wars-a-new-beginning/
Speaking from his boyhood home of Jakarta, Indonesia, yesterday, President Obama said, "America is not, and never will be, at war with Islam." His talking point misses the point because Islam is at war with America.
The White House billed the event as a follow-up to Mr. Obama's June 2009 Cairo speech "attempting to soothe historic tensions between America and Muslim communities around the world." The president reiterated the messages of his earlier address, in which he called for a "new beginning" in U.S.-Muslim relations. This new beginning, however, has run into the same old problems. After a brief burst of enthusiasm early in his first year, Mr. Obama's approval ratings in the Muslim world have sunk to those of his predecessor, George W. Bush, who launched wars against Muslim countries. . . . .
Lots of Unions Are on the ‘Hidden’ List to Receive ObamaCare Waivers
From: The Blaze
Lots of Unions Are on the ‘Hidden’ List to Receive ObamaCare Waivers
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/lots-of-unions-are-on-the-hidden-list-to-receive-obamacare-waivers/
If ObamaCare is such a good idea, then why are there 111 companies on the waiver list?
That’s the question in this Fox News segment: . . . .
Lots of Unions Are on the ‘Hidden’ List to Receive ObamaCare Waivers
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/lots-of-unions-are-on-the-hidden-list-to-receive-obamacare-waivers/
If ObamaCare is such a good idea, then why are there 111 companies on the waiver list?
That’s the question in this Fox News segment: . . . .
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Pelosi: ‘We Didn’t Lose Because of Me’
From: The Wall Street Journal
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she has the “overwhelming support” of fellow Democrats in her bid to become minority leader in the next Congress, and says she’s not to blame for the Democrats’ mid-term debacle.
“We didn’t lose the election because of me,” Ms. Pelosi told National Public Radio in an interview that aired Friday morning. “Our members do not accept that.”
Instead, the California Democrat attributes the loss of at least 60 seats to high unemployment and “$100 million of outside, unidentified funding.”
“Any party that cannot turn (9.5% unemployment) into political gains should hang up the gloves,” she said. . . .
Pelosi: ‘We Didn’t Lose Because of Me’
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/11/12/pelosi-we-didnt-lose-because-of-me/House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she has the “overwhelming support” of fellow Democrats in her bid to become minority leader in the next Congress, and says she’s not to blame for the Democrats’ mid-term debacle.
“We didn’t lose the election because of me,” Ms. Pelosi told National Public Radio in an interview that aired Friday morning. “Our members do not accept that.”
Instead, the California Democrat attributes the loss of at least 60 seats to high unemployment and “$100 million of outside, unidentified funding.”
“Any party that cannot turn (9.5% unemployment) into political gains should hang up the gloves,” she said. . . .
Muslim Group Advises Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow TSA ‘Enhanced Pat Downs’ Only on Head and Neck Area
From: CNS News
Muslim Group Advises Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow TSA ‘Enhanced Pat Downs’ Only on Head and Neck Area
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/muslim-group-advises-women-wearing-hijab
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has issued a travel warning to Muslim airline passengers on U.S. aircraft in response to the Transportation Safety Administration’s "enhanced pat down" policy that went into effect in late October.
CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck. . . . .
Muslim Group Advises Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow TSA ‘Enhanced Pat Downs’ Only on Head and Neck Area
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/muslim-group-advises-women-wearing-hijab
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has issued a travel warning to Muslim airline passengers on U.S. aircraft in response to the Transportation Safety Administration’s "enhanced pat down" policy that went into effect in late October.
CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck. . . . .
Friday, November 12, 2010
How Much Does George Soros Control?
From: The Blaze
Beck TV: How Much Does George Soros Control?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/beck-tv-how-much-does-george-soros-control/
15:49 video
Beck TV: How Much Does George Soros Control?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/beck-tv-how-much-does-george-soros-control/
15:49 video
Beck: Pay attention America; Soros’s Five-Step Plan to bring down America in his own words(Video)
From: Red, White, and Blue News
Beck: Pay attention America; Soros’s Five-Step Plan to bring down America in his own words(Video)
http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=12007
The fact that Soros has taken down several other countries, because the citizens had no idea what he was doing, makes him the most dangerous man on the planet!! The fact that he is trying his crap in America, where we have patriots like Glenn Beck, shows he knows NOTHING about the spirit of America!!
Say what you want about Glenn Beck but all he is doing is REPORTING the actual WORDS FROM George Soros mouth…..Prove him wrong…..Please. Bet ya can’t! But but but, it’s Glenn Beck. SO WHAT? Listen to the message and tell me where he is wrong, and I will take down the post. . . . .
Beck: Pay attention America; Soros’s Five-Step Plan to bring down America in his own words(Video)
http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=12007
The fact that Soros has taken down several other countries, because the citizens had no idea what he was doing, makes him the most dangerous man on the planet!! The fact that he is trying his crap in America, where we have patriots like Glenn Beck, shows he knows NOTHING about the spirit of America!!
Say what you want about Glenn Beck but all he is doing is REPORTING the actual WORDS FROM George Soros mouth…..Prove him wrong…..Please. Bet ya can’t! But but but, it’s Glenn Beck. SO WHAT? Listen to the message and tell me where he is wrong, and I will take down the post. . . . .
So much for Snopes.com… another propaganda arm funded by George Soros and the Democratic Party!
From: Skips Place
So much for Snopes.com… another propaganda arm funded by George Soros and the Democratic Party!
http://skipper810.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/so-much-for-snopes-com…-another-propaganda-arm-funded-by-george-soros-and-the-democratic-party/
Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source.
The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.
For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the ‘tell-all final word’ on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. . . . . .
So much for Snopes.com… another propaganda arm funded by George Soros and the Democratic Party!
http://skipper810.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/so-much-for-snopes-com…-another-propaganda-arm-funded-by-george-soros-and-the-democratic-party/
Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source.
The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.
For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the ‘tell-all final word’ on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. . . . . .
Thursday, November 11, 2010
The Tea Party is now more powerful than President Obama
From: The European Union Times
The Tea Party is now more powerful than President Obama
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/09/the-tea-party-is-now-more-powerful-than-president-obama/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheEuropeanUnionTimes+%28The+European+Union+Times%29
Who would have predicted this a year ago? Certainly not the complacent army of White House spin doctors who have failed to grasp, let alone acknowledge, the momentous political transformation that is sweeping America. CNN’s latest poll confirms that the Tea Party movement has more political clout than the President of the United States in influencing voters during this November’s mid-terms. While just 37 percent of Americans are more likely to vote for a candidate if backed by Barack Obama, a far larger 50 percent will vote for a Tea-Party endorsed candidate.
As CNN puts it:
A solid majority of all Americans — 56 percent — say that Obama has fallen short of their expectations. As a result, the president is not in a position to help struggling Democratic candidates; only 37 percent of likely voters say they are more likely to vote for a congressional candidate backed by Obama.
In contrast, half of all likely voters now say they are likely to choose a candidate supported by the conservative Tea Party — contributing to the GOP’s 53 to 44 percent lead when such voters are asked which party’s candidate they will choose in November. . . . .
The Tea Party is now more powerful than President Obama
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/09/the-tea-party-is-now-more-powerful-than-president-obama/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheEuropeanUnionTimes+%28The+European+Union+Times%29
Who would have predicted this a year ago? Certainly not the complacent army of White House spin doctors who have failed to grasp, let alone acknowledge, the momentous political transformation that is sweeping America. CNN’s latest poll confirms that the Tea Party movement has more political clout than the President of the United States in influencing voters during this November’s mid-terms. While just 37 percent of Americans are more likely to vote for a candidate if backed by Barack Obama, a far larger 50 percent will vote for a Tea-Party endorsed candidate.
As CNN puts it:
A solid majority of all Americans — 56 percent — say that Obama has fallen short of their expectations. As a result, the president is not in a position to help struggling Democratic candidates; only 37 percent of likely voters say they are more likely to vote for a congressional candidate backed by Obama.
In contrast, half of all likely voters now say they are likely to choose a candidate supported by the conservative Tea Party — contributing to the GOP’s 53 to 44 percent lead when such voters are asked which party’s candidate they will choose in November. . . . .
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
A Canadian line of Campbell's soups has activists stewing over Islamic connection
From: The Washington Post
A Canadian line of Campbell's soups has activists stewing over Islamic connection
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/17/AR2010101702840.html
Andy Warhol found artistic inspiration in a can of Campbell's tomato soup. These days, some activists are finding sinister Muslim connections in the same can.
Campbell Soup Co., the Camden, N.J., food giant, has been fighting a grass-roots boycott of its products after its Canadian subsidiary rolled out a line of soups certified as halal, meaning they're prepared according to Islamic dietary laws.
Campbell Co. of Canada introduced the soups in a few Canadian markets in January, although American bloggers didn't catch up to the news until earlier this month.
That's when the tempest in a tomato-soup can started.
Blogger Pamela Geller began calling for a boycott earlier this month via her widely read site, Atlas Shrugs. Other bloggers soon joined in. . . . .
A Canadian line of Campbell's soups has activists stewing over Islamic connection
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/17/AR2010101702840.html
Andy Warhol found artistic inspiration in a can of Campbell's tomato soup. These days, some activists are finding sinister Muslim connections in the same can.
Campbell Soup Co., the Camden, N.J., food giant, has been fighting a grass-roots boycott of its products after its Canadian subsidiary rolled out a line of soups certified as halal, meaning they're prepared according to Islamic dietary laws.
Campbell Co. of Canada introduced the soups in a few Canadian markets in January, although American bloggers didn't catch up to the news until earlier this month.
That's when the tempest in a tomato-soup can started.
Blogger Pamela Geller began calling for a boycott earlier this month via her widely read site, Atlas Shrugs. Other bloggers soon joined in. . . . .
Barack Obama: We Must Embrace Globalism And The Emerging One World Economy
From: The Economic Collapse
Barack Obama: We Must Embrace Globalism And The Emerging One World Economy
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/barack-obama-we-must-embrace-globalism-and-the-emerging-one-world-economy
Although it received very little coverage in the mainstream media, Barack Obama made some comments about globalism during his speech in Mumbai, India that were very eye-opening. As he was discussing the new realities of world trade in 2010, Obama warned against "those who see globalization as a threat" and he spoke of the "integrated world" in which we all now live. But is merging the entire globe into a one world economy, a one world financial system and a one world labor market really the best thing for the American people?
For the past two decades, all U.S. presidents have been heralding the benefits of merging the American economy with the rest of the globe. George Bush Sr., Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama have all steadfastly supported the emerging one world economy. These presidents have each used different terms to describe this process such as "globalism", "globalization", "an integrated world", "the global economy" and even "a New World Order", but they have all meant the same thing. All of these presidents have sought to integrate the United States even more deeply into the developing one world economic system. . . . .
Barack Obama: We Must Embrace Globalism And The Emerging One World Economy
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/barack-obama-we-must-embrace-globalism-and-the-emerging-one-world-economy
Although it received very little coverage in the mainstream media, Barack Obama made some comments about globalism during his speech in Mumbai, India that were very eye-opening. As he was discussing the new realities of world trade in 2010, Obama warned against "those who see globalization as a threat" and he spoke of the "integrated world" in which we all now live. But is merging the entire globe into a one world economy, a one world financial system and a one world labor market really the best thing for the American people?
For the past two decades, all U.S. presidents have been heralding the benefits of merging the American economy with the rest of the globe. George Bush Sr., Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama have all steadfastly supported the emerging one world economy. These presidents have each used different terms to describe this process such as "globalism", "globalization", "an integrated world", "the global economy" and even "a New World Order", but they have all meant the same thing. All of these presidents have sought to integrate the United States even more deeply into the developing one world economic system. . . . .
Joe Biden update: The VP meets on government transparency today. But that meeting is closed
From: LA Times
Joe Biden update: The VP meets on government transparency today. But that meeting is closed
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/11/joe-biden-transparency.html
With President Obama out of the country tweaking things in Asia, carefully not bowing this time, and packing away some pista murg and balak papri chat, his trusty sidekick Joe Biden is left to find things to do back home.
There's a big Diwali party tonight at the White House. The vice president will be there.
But first, JB has a breakfast meeting with Sen. Chuck Hagel and then another one of those Middle Class Task Force events to try to find some of those thousands of missing green energy jobs that have been promised so often.
Joe's had some problems with promises recently. He assured everyone that last summer would be full of economic recovery. Which it wasn't. And Joe guaranteed that his Democratic Party would maintain majorities in both houses of Congress in last week's midterm election. Which it didn't. . . .
Joe Biden update: The VP meets on government transparency today. But that meeting is closed
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/11/joe-biden-transparency.html
With President Obama out of the country tweaking things in Asia, carefully not bowing this time, and packing away some pista murg and balak papri chat, his trusty sidekick Joe Biden is left to find things to do back home.
There's a big Diwali party tonight at the White House. The vice president will be there.
But first, JB has a breakfast meeting with Sen. Chuck Hagel and then another one of those Middle Class Task Force events to try to find some of those thousands of missing green energy jobs that have been promised so often.
Joe's had some problems with promises recently. He assured everyone that last summer would be full of economic recovery. Which it wasn't. And Joe guaranteed that his Democratic Party would maintain majorities in both houses of Congress in last week's midterm election. Which it didn't. . . .
Christian woman sentenced to death in Pakistan 'for blasphemy'
From: The Telegraph
Christian woman sentenced to death in Pakistan 'for blasphemy'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/8120142/Christian-woman-sentenced-to-death-in-Pakistan-for-blasphemy.html
A Christian woman has been sentenced to hang in Pakistan after being convicted of defaming the Prophet Mohammed.
Asia Bibi, a 45-year-old mother-of-five, denies blasphemy and told investigators that she was being persecuted for her faith in a country where Christians face routine harassment and discrimination.
Christian groups and human rights campaigners condemned the verdict and called for the blasphemy laws to be repealed.
Her supporters say she will now appeal against the sentence handed down in a local court in the town of Sheikhupura, near Lahore, Pakistan. . . . .
Christian woman sentenced to death in Pakistan 'for blasphemy'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/8120142/Christian-woman-sentenced-to-death-in-Pakistan-for-blasphemy.html
A Christian woman has been sentenced to hang in Pakistan after being convicted of defaming the Prophet Mohammed.
Asia Bibi, a 45-year-old mother-of-five, denies blasphemy and told investigators that she was being persecuted for her faith in a country where Christians face routine harassment and discrimination.
Christian groups and human rights campaigners condemned the verdict and called for the blasphemy laws to be repealed.
Her supporters say she will now appeal against the sentence handed down in a local court in the town of Sheikhupura, near Lahore, Pakistan. . . . .
Soros group wants Obama to rule by executive order
From: World Net Daily
Soros group wants Obama to rule by executive order: Organization cites mid-terms, claims progressives registered victory
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225829
It was progressives who won the mid-term elections, particularly incumbents in a socialist-founded congressional caucus that emerged from last week's ballots virtually unscathed, boasted an article published by the George Soros-funded Institute for Policy Studies, a Marxist-oriented think-tank in Washington, D.C.
The article recommends that President Obama govern from executive order to push through a progressive agenda.
"Progressives won in the 2010 mid-term elections," wrote Karen Dolan, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, or IPS, and director of the Cities for Progress and Cities for Peace projects based at the radical organization. . . . .
Soros group wants Obama to rule by executive order: Organization cites mid-terms, claims progressives registered victory
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225829
It was progressives who won the mid-term elections, particularly incumbents in a socialist-founded congressional caucus that emerged from last week's ballots virtually unscathed, boasted an article published by the George Soros-funded Institute for Policy Studies, a Marxist-oriented think-tank in Washington, D.C.
The article recommends that President Obama govern from executive order to push through a progressive agenda.
"Progressives won in the 2010 mid-term elections," wrote Karen Dolan, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, or IPS, and director of the Cities for Progress and Cities for Peace projects based at the radical organization. . . . .
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted
From: World Net Daily
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: 'There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=225561
A congressional document posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, and that status remains undocumented to this day.
It's because state and federal law did not require anyone in Congress or elsewhere to check to see if Obama was a "natural born Citizen" under the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, according the document.
The analysis by the Congressional Research Service, a research arm of the U.S. Congress, openly admits no one in the federal government, including Congress, ever asked to see Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. It explains no one was required to do so. . . . .
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted: 'There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=225561
A congressional document posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, and that status remains undocumented to this day.
It's because state and federal law did not require anyone in Congress or elsewhere to check to see if Obama was a "natural born Citizen" under the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, according the document.
The analysis by the Congressional Research Service, a research arm of the U.S. Congress, openly admits no one in the federal government, including Congress, ever asked to see Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. It explains no one was required to do so. . . . .
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Court Grants Temporary Order to Block Oklahoma From Shariah Amendment
From: Fox News
Court Grants Temporary Order to Block Oklahoma From Shariah Amendment
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/08/court-grants-temporary-order-block-oklahoma-shariah-amendment/
A temporary restraining order has been issued to block a state constitutional amendment that prohibits state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases.
U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange handed down the ruling Monday morning in Oklahoma City following a brief hearing.
The order will remain in effect until a Nov. 22 hearing on a requested preliminary injunction. It prevents the state election board from certifying the results of Tuesday's general election in which the amendment was approved by 70 percent of the voters. . . .
Court Grants Temporary Order to Block Oklahoma From Shariah Amendment
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/08/court-grants-temporary-order-block-oklahoma-shariah-amendment/
A temporary restraining order has been issued to block a state constitutional amendment that prohibits state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases.
U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange handed down the ruling Monday morning in Oklahoma City following a brief hearing.
The order will remain in effect until a Nov. 22 hearing on a requested preliminary injunction. It prevents the state election board from certifying the results of Tuesday's general election in which the amendment was approved by 70 percent of the voters. . . .
Obama Remembers Mumbai Massacre; Forgets Ft. Hood First Anniversary
From: Big Peace
Obama Remembers Mumbai Massacre; Forgets Ft. Hood First Anniversary
http://bigpeace.com/sahiller/2010/11/08/obama-remembers-mumbai-massacre-forgets-ft-hood-first-anniversary/
The first week of November proved historic with the Democrat mauling in the mid-term elections and the 10th anniversary of the crews aboard the international space station, but there was one notable event that went unnoticed by the White House. The first anniversary of the Fort Hood massacre.
President Obama’s remarks a year ago were odd enough leading with an unpresidential and out of touch “shout out,” but for the White House to completely ignore the Ft. Hood anniversary is disturbing.
Obama, though he likes to remind himself that he is the commander-in-chief, has always demonstrated his disdain for our troops and seemingly cannot help it. Ignoring Ft. Hood is just another example.
America lost 14, yes 14, lives that day. The Hill reported: . . . . .
Obama Remembers Mumbai Massacre; Forgets Ft. Hood First Anniversary
http://bigpeace.com/sahiller/2010/11/08/obama-remembers-mumbai-massacre-forgets-ft-hood-first-anniversary/
The first week of November proved historic with the Democrat mauling in the mid-term elections and the 10th anniversary of the crews aboard the international space station, but there was one notable event that went unnoticed by the White House. The first anniversary of the Fort Hood massacre.
President Obama’s remarks a year ago were odd enough leading with an unpresidential and out of touch “shout out,” but for the White House to completely ignore the Ft. Hood anniversary is disturbing.
Obama, though he likes to remind himself that he is the commander-in-chief, has always demonstrated his disdain for our troops and seemingly cannot help it. Ignoring Ft. Hood is just another example.
America lost 14, yes 14, lives that day. The Hill reported: . . . . .
Schoolboys punished with detention for refusing to kneel in class and pray to Allah
From:
Schoolboys punished with detention for refusing to kneel in class and pray to Allah
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1031784/Schoolboys-punished-detention-refusing-kneel-pray-Allah.html
Two schoolboys were given detention after refusing to kneel down and 'pray to Allah' during a religious education lesson.
Parents were outraged that the two boys from year seven (11 to 12-year-olds) were punished for not wanting to take part in the practical demonstration of how Allah is worshipped.
They said forcing their children to take part in the exercise at Alsager High School, near Stoke-on-Trent - which included wearing Muslim headgear - was a breach of their human rights. . . . .
Schoolboys punished with detention for refusing to kneel in class and pray to Allah
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1031784/Schoolboys-punished-detention-refusing-kneel-pray-Allah.html
Two schoolboys were given detention after refusing to kneel down and 'pray to Allah' during a religious education lesson.
Parents were outraged that the two boys from year seven (11 to 12-year-olds) were punished for not wanting to take part in the practical demonstration of how Allah is worshipped.
They said forcing their children to take part in the exercise at Alsager High School, near Stoke-on-Trent - which included wearing Muslim headgear - was a breach of their human rights. . . . .
Monday, November 8, 2010
R.I.P.: Al Gore’s Chicago Climate Exchange Has Died
From: National Review Online
R.I.P.: Al Gore’s Chicago Climate Exchange Has Died
http://www.nationalreview.com/planet-gore/252703/rip-al-gores-chicago-climate-exchange-has-died-greg-pollowitz
Global warming-inspired cap and trade has been one of the most stridently debated public policy controversies of the past 15 years. But it is dying a quiet death. In a little reported move, the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) announced on Oct. 21 that it will be ending carbon trading – the only purpose for which it was founded – this year.
Although the trading in carbon emissions credits was voluntary, the CCX was intended to be the hub of the mandatory carbon trading established by a cap-and-trade law, like the Waxman-Markey scheme passed by the House in June 2009.
At its founding in November 2000, it was estimated that the size of CCX’s carbon trading market could reach $500 billion. That estimate ballooned over the years to $10 trillion.
Al Capone tried to use Prohibition to muscle in on a piece of all the action in Chicago. The CCX’s backers wanted to use a new prohibition on carbon emissions to muscle in on a piece of, quite literally, all the action in the world.
The CCX was the brainchild of Northwestern University business professor Richard Sandor, who used $1.1 million in grants from the Chicago-based left-wing Joyce Foundation to launch the CCX. For his efforts, Time named Sandor as one of its Heroes of the Planet in 2002 and one of its Heroes of the Environment in 2007. . . .
R.I.P.: Al Gore’s Chicago Climate Exchange Has Died
http://www.nationalreview.com/planet-gore/252703/rip-al-gores-chicago-climate-exchange-has-died-greg-pollowitz
Global warming-inspired cap and trade has been one of the most stridently debated public policy controversies of the past 15 years. But it is dying a quiet death. In a little reported move, the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) announced on Oct. 21 that it will be ending carbon trading – the only purpose for which it was founded – this year.
Although the trading in carbon emissions credits was voluntary, the CCX was intended to be the hub of the mandatory carbon trading established by a cap-and-trade law, like the Waxman-Markey scheme passed by the House in June 2009.
At its founding in November 2000, it was estimated that the size of CCX’s carbon trading market could reach $500 billion. That estimate ballooned over the years to $10 trillion.
Al Capone tried to use Prohibition to muscle in on a piece of all the action in Chicago. The CCX’s backers wanted to use a new prohibition on carbon emissions to muscle in on a piece of, quite literally, all the action in the world.
The CCX was the brainchild of Northwestern University business professor Richard Sandor, who used $1.1 million in grants from the Chicago-based left-wing Joyce Foundation to launch the CCX. For his efforts, Time named Sandor as one of its Heroes of the Planet in 2002 and one of its Heroes of the Environment in 2007. . . .
Rep. Issa: "I'm Going To Be Doing A Lot Of Investigating"
From: Real Clear Politics / 12:24 video
Rep. Issa: "I'm Going To Be Doing A Lot Of Investigating"
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/11/07/rep_issa_im_going_to_be_doing_a_lot_of_investigating.html
“The most important thing my Committee can do is seek the truth. We’re the investigations committee, we’re the accountability committee, but Paul [Ryan] can’t be effective if the underlying facts and assumptions are not mutually agreed and it’s one of the problems we had in the previous two years was that we couldn’t agree on what the facts were therefore the conclusions that were different – each side blamed the other – that’s got to end," Rep. Issa (R-CA) told "FOX News Sunday."
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) also joins the show to discuss how House Republicans will heed the message voters sent Washington: cut spending, cut waste, cut government intervention in our daily lives.
Rep. Issa: "I'm Going To Be Doing A Lot Of Investigating"
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/11/07/rep_issa_im_going_to_be_doing_a_lot_of_investigating.html
“The most important thing my Committee can do is seek the truth. We’re the investigations committee, we’re the accountability committee, but Paul [Ryan] can’t be effective if the underlying facts and assumptions are not mutually agreed and it’s one of the problems we had in the previous two years was that we couldn’t agree on what the facts were therefore the conclusions that were different – each side blamed the other – that’s got to end," Rep. Issa (R-CA) told "FOX News Sunday."
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) also joins the show to discuss how House Republicans will heed the message voters sent Washington: cut spending, cut waste, cut government intervention in our daily lives.
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Supporters Block Funeral Protest in Weston
From: Fox 4 KC / 2:11 video
Supporters Block Funeral Protest in Weston
http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-cjsadell-funeral-westboro-church-protest-110610,0,3649584.story
People in Weston, Missouri banded together on Saturday. They wanted to protect loved ones who were saying goodbye to a fallen soldier and stood up to members of the Westboro Baptist Church who planned to protest at Sgt. First Class C.J. Sadell's funeral.
Sadell died October 24 from injuries he suffered in a surprise attack in Afghanistan. On Saturday, there was quite a turnout of people who wanted to keep the protesters away from the funeral.
"I'd say probably half the people in Weston are here," said Eric Moser, Marine Corp veteran.
Weston has less than 2,000 residents, and hundreds of people showed up to support the family of First Sgt. Sadell.
Sadell was in the Arif Kala region of Afghanistan when his unit was ambushed October 5. Five soldiers died and Sadell was badly injured. . . . . .
Supporters Block Funeral Protest in Weston
http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-cjsadell-funeral-westboro-church-protest-110610,0,3649584.story
People in Weston, Missouri banded together on Saturday. They wanted to protect loved ones who were saying goodbye to a fallen soldier and stood up to members of the Westboro Baptist Church who planned to protest at Sgt. First Class C.J. Sadell's funeral.
Sadell died October 24 from injuries he suffered in a surprise attack in Afghanistan. On Saturday, there was quite a turnout of people who wanted to keep the protesters away from the funeral.
"I'd say probably half the people in Weston are here," said Eric Moser, Marine Corp veteran.
Weston has less than 2,000 residents, and hundreds of people showed up to support the family of First Sgt. Sadell.
Sadell was in the Arif Kala region of Afghanistan when his unit was ambushed October 5. Five soldiers died and Sadell was badly injured. . . . . .
Oh, the irony! Look who's calling you terrorist!
From: World Net Daily
Oh, the irony! Look who's calling you terrorist!: Former Weather Underground leader worries about 'armed' tea parties
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=224817
A former leader of a '70s protest group responsible for bombing the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon, police stations and other targets is worried that "racist, armed, hostile, crazy-making" tea parties pose an "unspeakable" threat to America.
Bernardine Dohrn, who with her husband William Ayers were leaders of the communist revolutionary Weather Underground, had been tied to so many acts of protest violence in the '70s that she was placed on the FBI's Top 10 Most Wanted List and was described by J. Edgar Hoover as the "most dangerous woman in America."
Her association with Barack Obama notably led to Sarah Palin's famous comment during the 2008 presidential campaign that Obama had been "palling around with terrorists."
Dohrn, however, told an Indian news and views website that she's concerned about a new breed of protesters, the tea partiers, whom she describes as "a hard right emerging, an armed, new hard right with massive control of media."
"It's racist, it's armed, it's hostile, it's unspeakable," she said. "White people armed, demanding an end to this president – it's very crazy-producing." . . . . .
Oh, the irony! Look who's calling you terrorist!: Former Weather Underground leader worries about 'armed' tea parties
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=224817
A former leader of a '70s protest group responsible for bombing the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon, police stations and other targets is worried that "racist, armed, hostile, crazy-making" tea parties pose an "unspeakable" threat to America.
Bernardine Dohrn, who with her husband William Ayers were leaders of the communist revolutionary Weather Underground, had been tied to so many acts of protest violence in the '70s that she was placed on the FBI's Top 10 Most Wanted List and was described by J. Edgar Hoover as the "most dangerous woman in America."
Her association with Barack Obama notably led to Sarah Palin's famous comment during the 2008 presidential campaign that Obama had been "palling around with terrorists."
Dohrn, however, told an Indian news and views website that she's concerned about a new breed of protesters, the tea partiers, whom she describes as "a hard right emerging, an armed, new hard right with massive control of media."
"It's racist, it's armed, it's hostile, it's unspeakable," she said. "White people armed, demanding an end to this president – it's very crazy-producing." . . . . .
Chris Christe: It's Time For The GOP To Put Up, Or Shut Up
4:12 YouTube video
Chris Christe: It's Time For The GOP To Put Up, Or Shut Up
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGEUCu9TwqI
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on Meet The Press 11/7/2010 discussing the results of the 2010 midterms.
Chris Christe: It's Time For The GOP To Put Up, Or Shut Up
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGEUCu9TwqI
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on Meet The Press 11/7/2010 discussing the results of the 2010 midterms.
Saturday, November 6, 2010
U.S. Islamic Web Site Is Taken Down
From: New York Times
U.S. Islamic Web Site Is Taken Down
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/06/world/europe/06london.html?_r=3
A United States-based extremist Islamic Web site was taken down on Friday after the British authorities complained of a post praising a young woman who stabbed and nearly killed a British lawmaker over his support for the Iraq war.
The post included a list of 383 British lawmakers who voted for the war, with instructions on tracking their movements, and it called for Muslims to “raise the knife of Jihad” against them, according to The Times of London, which reported the post on Friday. It also included a link for buying a kitchen knife, the report said.
The site, RevolutionMuslim.com, is no longer available, but Google shows a cached version that predates the post. It is registered in Bellevue, Wash., a suburb of Seattle, and was run this year from Brooklyn. . . . . .
U.S. Islamic Web Site Is Taken Down
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/06/world/europe/06london.html?_r=3
A United States-based extremist Islamic Web site was taken down on Friday after the British authorities complained of a post praising a young woman who stabbed and nearly killed a British lawmaker over his support for the Iraq war.
The post included a list of 383 British lawmakers who voted for the war, with instructions on tracking their movements, and it called for Muslims to “raise the knife of Jihad” against them, according to The Times of London, which reported the post on Friday. It also included a link for buying a kitchen knife, the report said.
The site, RevolutionMuslim.com, is no longer available, but Google shows a cached version that predates the post. It is registered in Bellevue, Wash., a suburb of Seattle, and was run this year from Brooklyn. . . . . .
Help stop sharia in the West, support Elisabeth Sabbaditsch-Wolf (video)
From: Creeping Sharia\ 6:50 video
Help stop sharia in the West, support Elisabeth Sabbaditsch-Wolf (video)
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2010/11/06/help-stop-sharia-in-the-west-support-elisabeth-sabbaditsch-wolf-video/
According to sharia, Islamic law, non-Muslims have a diminished status as second-rate citizens in their own countries. This is precisely the position that native Europeans de facto have under Multiculturalism, which essentially means that Western authorities are already partly implementing sharia law. In Western Europe, the authorities both on the national level and on the European Union level are not only passively accepting Islamization but are actively promoting and enforcing this.
This is the main thesis of Bat Ye’or’s pioneering work Eurabia as well as my own book Defeating Eurabia. What we are witnessing in the ridiculous trial against Geert Wilders in the Netherlands is the practical implementation of Eurabia.
That is what the case against Sabaditsch-Wolff is about. She has found herself at the frontline of the battle against the ongoing destruction of the West, and we are all next in line. For that reason, we should give her our full support, morally as well as financially, and we should put Austrian authorities to shame for their betrayal and blatant submission to Muslim bullying.
Help stop sharia in the West, support Elisabeth Sabbaditsch-Wolf (video)
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2010/11/06/help-stop-sharia-in-the-west-support-elisabeth-sabbaditsch-wolf-video/
According to sharia, Islamic law, non-Muslims have a diminished status as second-rate citizens in their own countries. This is precisely the position that native Europeans de facto have under Multiculturalism, which essentially means that Western authorities are already partly implementing sharia law. In Western Europe, the authorities both on the national level and on the European Union level are not only passively accepting Islamization but are actively promoting and enforcing this.
This is the main thesis of Bat Ye’or’s pioneering work Eurabia as well as my own book Defeating Eurabia. What we are witnessing in the ridiculous trial against Geert Wilders in the Netherlands is the practical implementation of Eurabia.
That is what the case against Sabaditsch-Wolff is about. She has found herself at the frontline of the battle against the ongoing destruction of the West, and we are all next in line. For that reason, we should give her our full support, morally as well as financially, and we should put Austrian authorities to shame for their betrayal and blatant submission to Muslim bullying.
Friday, November 5, 2010
GLENN BECK WARNS OF CATASTROPHIC EVENT & NEEDING TO STOCKPILE FOOD
11:28 YouTube video
GLENN BECK WARNS OF CATASTROPHIC EVENT & NEEDING TO STOCKPILE FOOD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzsJoVyidhU&sns=fb
Glenn Beck on the Premiere Radio Networks 'The Glenn Beck Program' issues a warning to the populace of the Globe. Prepare for a massive coming event leading to a New World Order at any time. He advises you like others to stockpile food. This broadcast was on November 5th 2010. This is another warning from someone within the main stream media as was the case recently with Tony Robbins.warning which can be found at; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_rShZ...
Prepare for Hyperinflation, Economic Collapse, Currency full scale devaluation and a whole host of other events which may be pulled off in order to distract you from the Economic Collapse that is near. The Romans need to establish a false blame proxy for the event which was coming anyhow. Watch for a terrorist event or man-made weather incident to take the blame. This could be an event with Iran cutting off oil thus creating utter chaos in the already damaged economic world. We know they desire global war.
GLENN BECK WARNS OF CATASTROPHIC EVENT & NEEDING TO STOCKPILE FOOD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzsJoVyidhU&sns=fb
Glenn Beck on the Premiere Radio Networks 'The Glenn Beck Program' issues a warning to the populace of the Globe. Prepare for a massive coming event leading to a New World Order at any time. He advises you like others to stockpile food. This broadcast was on November 5th 2010. This is another warning from someone within the main stream media as was the case recently with Tony Robbins.warning which can be found at; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_rShZ...
Prepare for Hyperinflation, Economic Collapse, Currency full scale devaluation and a whole host of other events which may be pulled off in order to distract you from the Economic Collapse that is near. The Romans need to establish a false blame proxy for the event which was coming anyhow. Watch for a terrorist event or man-made weather incident to take the blame. This could be an event with Iran cutting off oil thus creating utter chaos in the already damaged economic world. We know they desire global war.
Hans A. von Spakovsky: E-mail shows illegal activity in Reid's campaign
From: The Washington Examiner
Hans A. von Spakovsky: E-mail shows illegal activity in Reid's campaign
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/E-mail-shows-illegal-activity-in-Reid_s-campaign-1458042-106720628.html
Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., may have beaten back challenger Sharron Angle and retained his post as the majority leader, but his campaign and one of his biggest supporters may have violated federal law to do so.
As National Review reported earlier this week, the Reid campaign sent a desperate e-mail to the senior vice president for government relations at Harrah's Casinos asking the company to pressure its employees to get out and vote for Reid. The campaign even offered to have Reid call Harrah's executives to help give "the backing" needed to get the company working on this.
The Reid staffer involved told Harrah's it needed to "put a headlock" on its supervisors "to get them to follow through."
This plea was distributed to senior executives throughout the company by a Harrah's vice president, Marybel Batjer. Batjer demanded that those executives "do whatever we need to do to get the supervisors to know that there is NOTHING more important than to get employees out to vote. Waking up to a defeat of Harry Reid Nov 3rd will be devastating for our industry's future.". . . . .
Hans A. von Spakovsky: E-mail shows illegal activity in Reid's campaign
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/E-mail-shows-illegal-activity-in-Reid_s-campaign-1458042-106720628.html
Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., may have beaten back challenger Sharron Angle and retained his post as the majority leader, but his campaign and one of his biggest supporters may have violated federal law to do so.
As National Review reported earlier this week, the Reid campaign sent a desperate e-mail to the senior vice president for government relations at Harrah's Casinos asking the company to pressure its employees to get out and vote for Reid. The campaign even offered to have Reid call Harrah's executives to help give "the backing" needed to get the company working on this.
The Reid staffer involved told Harrah's it needed to "put a headlock" on its supervisors "to get them to follow through."
This plea was distributed to senior executives throughout the company by a Harrah's vice president, Marybel Batjer. Batjer demanded that those executives "do whatever we need to do to get the supervisors to know that there is NOTHING more important than to get employees out to vote. Waking up to a defeat of Harry Reid Nov 3rd will be devastating for our industry's future.". . . . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)