By Kevin Pezzi
Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate after the Democrat received 312 more votes than Norm Coleman in a recount. However, a subsequent investigation by Minnesota Majority found that hundreds of felons participated in the 2008 election even though they are not legally entitled to vote. This is significant because felons historically prefer Democratic candidates 85% of the time, so Franken's narrow margin of victory may have resulted from lax enforcement of voting laws in Minnesota. Investigators found that 393 felons voted in just two of Minnesota's 87 counties. If you consider only the first two counties, it is very likely that Coleman, a Republican, should have won. Considering votes cast by felons in the remaining 85 counties, it is virtually certain that Franken lost the election and hence never had a right to be a United States Senator or a right to vote for ObamaCare, which would not have passed without Franken's support.
Mark Ritchie is Minnesota's Secretary of State, making him the state's chief election officer who is responsible for the integrity of their voter registration system and elections. According to John Fund of The Wall Street Journal, Ritchie—a Democrat—“was the ACORN-supported candidate through a George Soros group . . . and there have been a lot of accusations that he has not been particularly playing it on the level with regard to this race.”
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Julie Fernandes ordered Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys not to enforce the section of the law that requires purging ineligible voters (such as dead people, felons, and people who've moved) from the voter rolls.
Mr. Fund commented, this “would explain why when Minnesota Majority took their complaint to the Justice Department, they never heard back.” He added, “Every state, not just Minnesota, has lots of felons who are ineligible to vote, but there is very little enforcement; almost no one has been prosecuted on this. Washington state had a governor's race a few years ago decided by 131 votes; more than that number of felons voted illegally.”
What we are witnessing is the systematic erosion of the legal pillars on which our government derives its just powers to govern us; fraudulent elections cannot confer just powers.
Just powers is a phrase from the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
More proof of fraud in the Minnesota Senate race
In November 2008 I performed a statistical analysis that offered overwhelming evidence of fraud that enabled Franken to “win.” Here's my blog posting about this:
The vote gap between Norm Coleman (R) and Al Franken (D for Dumb) has progressively narrowed from 727 to 236. What's more than a bit suspicious about this is that several news sources have reported finding batches of ballots with ALL votes for Franken and NONE for Coleman. That's like spilling a piggy bank with 491 pennies in it, and finding that all just happen to land with heads facing up. The odds of that are so astronomical that it is many trillions of times less probable than beyond a reasonable doubt. Even when the votes are found in heavily Democratic areas—something highly suspicious in itself—it still stinks to high heaven. When asked about this, Governor Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota agreed that it defied rational explanation because Coleman would be expected to receive about one-third of the votes in those Democratic areas.
Get out your scientific calculator and plug in (.67) yx (491); the result isn't appreciably different from (.5) yx (491). It is still many trillions of times less probable than beyond a reasonable doubt.
The probability of finding just a single batch of 100 votes for Franken is:
In a heavily Democratic area: 0.00000000000000000405
It is very difficult to appreciate how vanishingly small this chance is, but this may help clarify its stark improbability. Imagine that you had a piggy bank filled with 100 coins. If you could spill the coins, count the number of heads and tails, and replace them in the piggy bank every 10 seconds (and good luck doing it that fast!), it would still take about 80 billion years to have a reasonable chance of the coins landing with all heads or tails up.
In a typical area (representative of the whole state): 0.000000000000000000000000000000788
That would take a mere 800 trillion years.
Statistical improbabilities far more likely than these are sufficient to send men to the electric chair, so we have, once again, proof that the Democrats are cheating. If they weren't so ignorant of statistics, they could have concocted a better way to cheat.
Repeat after me, D is for Dumb.
In another note (Just the tip of the voting fraud iceberg), I documented more ways in which Democrats have corrupted elections. Obama's campaign team violated election laws from sea to shining sea to put him in office. His presidency is therefore indeed very historic—he is our first fraudulent President: a Pseudo-President.
Joseph Stalin said, “I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this: who will count the votes, and how.”
His statement is usually translated as, “The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”
His statement could be updated to say, “The people who dodge the voting laws and get away with it decide everything.”
A phony Senator from Minnesota and a Pseudo-President add up to ObamaCare and other legislation that is as legitimate as Monopoly money. Now, what are we going to do about it?
Related ObamaGate notes:
Just the tip of the voting fraud iceberg
ObamaGate: How the New Black Panther Party could end Obama's presidency
From life to death, cracker
No comments:
Post a Comment